RQ51Comments

From Requirements Engineering Specialist Group

Jump to: navigation, search

Comments for Requirements Quarterly 51 (pdf)

Please feel free to comment on any of the articles - note an error or oversight, add a confirmation, share observations and your wealth of varied experience. Click the link at the top to add your words. We look forward to hearing from you.


Name (required):

Comment:

Peter Radford | 17:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

It would help if there were page numbers on pages 3 to N!

Otherwise a fine effort

Simon Hutton | RQ Editor | 14:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Peter - Many thanks for your observation that page numbering disappeared after page 3. I can only blame Microsoft formatting, hoping that this will at least earn me some sympathy! The error has been corrected in RQ53.

Retrieved from "http://www.resg.org.uk/index.php/RQ51Comments"
Views